|
|
Dietary Assessment Literature Review:
|
|
|
Research Needs in Infant and Toddler Populations
This review confirms the scant available information on the validity and
measurement error for the FFQ (Food
Frequency Questionnaire), DH (Diet
History), and FRs (Food
Records) in infant and toddler populations. Validation studies on the
24HR (24-Hour
Recall) and on methods to assess supplement intake are lacking. Validation
studies using larger and more representative populations, similar methodologies,
and that examine the impact of gender, ethnicity or infant age on the validity
of infant and toddler feeding measures are needed. Scanlon et al. identified
the need for a comprehensive study that evaluates multiple measures of infant
feeding simultaneously (78).
The reliability of test weighing and the DLW (Doubly
Labeled Water) method in representative population samples also should
be evaluated. As in all age groups, the further use of biomarkers to evaluate
accuracy of subjective self-report methods is needed. The impact of social
desirability on reporting on infant intake should be examined, especially
with regard to reporting important parenting behaviors such as infant feeding.
In addition, research is needed on the impact of parental BMI (Body-Mass
Index), education, and ethnicity on reporting validity. Finally more work
is needed to validate portion size estimating aides (126).
In a longitudinal study, the timing and frequency of dietary assessment
in infants and toddlers should be examined.
|
|